Training-services prime
Comparable federal training delivery appears in checked award history.
Federal growth decisions, backed by evidence
Ask in plain English. No complex screens to learn.
Built for federal contractors who want to act fast — with the record in view.
Thomas Pownall / Laurie & Whittle, 1794 · The New York Public Library · public domain · FedScope grade
Choose the decision
Illustrative roles only — FedScope shows the shape of the answer without inventing firms, awards, agencies, or outcomes.
Your question
“Who has the past performance to team on this?”
Comparable federal training delivery appears in checked award history.
Why this match?
Related courseware delivery appears in checked award history.
Adjacent delivery appears in checked award history; current availability is unknown.
Award history is evidence of prior delivery—not proof of current certification, capacity, availability, or fit. Verify at the official source before acting.
Your question
“Is this opportunity worth our week?”
Award history is evidence of prior delivery—not proof of current certification, capacity, availability, or fit. Verify at the official source before acting.
This week’s brief · recorded decisions
Evidence attached; one open question routed to the delivery lead before the response window closes.
A capability gap may need a proven partner; the conversation goes out with the record in view.
Recorded with the reason, so the team never re-litigates the same call next quarter.
Recipients record Pursue, Discuss, or Pass themselves — the decision is human; FedScope keeps the evidence and the call together.
The mechanism
Only verified evidence reaches your answer.
The Hallucination Shield checks whether the record supports a claim before it appears. When the checked sources cannot answer, FedScope says so instead of smoothing over the gap.
Opportunity notices, award history, contractor registrations — each claim keeps its source.
Authorized, non-sensitive past performance and team context, private by default.
Verified evidence crosses. Unsupported assertions stop here, visibly.
Every material claim carries its record; what the record cannot support stays marked unknown.
The call is yours; FedScope keeps it next to the evidence it was made on.
Relevant federal work surfaces from a plain-language question.
Each claim opens to the record behind it before you commit hours.
The call and its reason are recorded together, once.
Decisions, evidence, and outcomes stay in your team’s memory.
Beta access
Join the beta list for access updates. We’ll announce pricing separately before paid access begins.
Trust, access, and limits
Ask for open opportunities, likely teaming partners, or the evidence behind a recommendation — in plain English, no filters or search syntax. Every result links to the federal records behind it, so you can check the answer before you act on it. From the same conversation you can save a partner, watch an opportunity, or add it to a brief for your team.
ChatGPT and Claude, with more planned. Each provider reviews apps before they appear in its directory and FedScope has not completed those reviews, so during beta you connect using a link from your dashboard. We will point you at an official listing once a provider publishes one.
The federal record is public, but it is spread across systems, keyed by identifiers rather than company names, and slow to search by hand. FedScope merges the records for a single company into one profile, answers a plain-English question against them, and shows its evidence — so the work shifts from assembling data to deciding what to do about it.
Public records the U.S. Government publishes — opportunity notices, awarded contracts, and contractor registrations. FedScope keeps its own indexed copy so answers are fast and a slow government site cannot stall your work. Because it is a copy, a very recent change may not have arrived yet; confirm anything with money or a deadline attached at the official source.
Every answer passes a check that withholds claims the records cannot support, so FedScope will sometimes tell you the record cannot answer your question rather than guess. That is the safeguard working. It cannot catch everything, which is why each claim links to its source — treat FedScope as research that shows its work, not as a system of record.
No. When a question is phrased in a way FedScope's built-in rules are unsure about, a small AI model is asked one thing: which official sources and time period the question is about. Its interpretation is checked before use — it can only choose among FedScope's existing search routes and can never introduce a company, date, or fact you did not type. Every number and record in an answer comes from the official sources FedScope searched, and if the model is slow or unavailable, the built-in rules answer instead.
No. Your questions, filters, saved partners, and watches are yours. The only thing another company can ever learn is a weekly count of how often it appeared in partner results, and only if it verified and opted in — never who searched, what you typed, or your filters. Note that when you ask from ChatGPT or Claude, that provider processes the conversation under your own account with them.
FedScope answers from real federal records, but it is early: access opens in stages, features are still being added, and you will find rough edges. Beta costs nothing — payments are not open, so nothing can charge you. That also means the deeper paid features cannot be bought yet; if your account does not already include one, it stays locked until we announce pricing.
Join the beta list and we will email you when your access window opens. No cost and no card details — we do not ask for a payment method at all. If FedScope is not yet a fit, tell us what you were hoping to ask; that is how we decide what to build next.
Yes. Add opportunities to your brief as you research, and FedScope drafts a decision-ready summary. You review it, add recipients, and nothing sends until you approve it. Each recipient marks every item pursue, discuss, or pass, and those decisions land back on your dashboard so the team's call is on the record.
You select your company by its federal record, then FedScope emails a contact already published in that government record for approval — not an address you supply. A matching work email supports a claim but never grants ownership on its own. Claims with no usable record contact, disputes, and higher-risk changes go to manual review, which may include a callback to a number FedScope sources independently.
That FedScope confirmed authority through the company's government-record channel or a documented manual review — not merely a matching email domain. We record how and when a claim was approved and block competing ownership. It is not an endorsement, a guarantee of current eligibility, or a check of anyone's legal identity.
Verified companies can turn on a weekly match digest: how often your company appeared in partner results. It reports aggregate counts only — never the searcher, their prompt, or the conversation — so you see the demand without exposing anyone's pursuit strategy. Turn it off from your dashboard or any digest email.
Nobody, by default. A verified company can share a document with one specific partner it has an accepted teaming relationship with; access is served through short-lived links, every view is logged, and the owner can revoke it at any time. FedScope never publishes raw CPARS reports to the network.
No. FedScope does not accept controlled or sensitive government information of any kind — including CUI, older markings such as FOUO, and anything classified. The product sits deliberately outside a CUI system boundary and does not claim NIST 800-171, CMMC, or FedRAMP compliance. Upload only authorized, non-sensitive material.
No. FedScope is an independent commercial service that reads public government records. It is not a system of record, and it is not endorsed by or sponsored by any agency. Always verify a notice at the linked official source before acting on it.
Not yet, and it is not ours to fix. ChatGPT and Claude do not run connectors while they are in voice mode, so a question asked out loud reaches the assistant but never reaches FedScope — you would get a general answer with no federal evidence behind it. Type your question instead. If a provider enables connectors in voice mode, this stops being a limitation and we will say so here.
No. FedScope is independent, with no affiliation, partnership, sponsorship, or endorsement from either. We name ChatGPT and Claude only to say which assistants FedScope works inside. You bring your own assistant account; FedScope supplies the federal evidence behind the answers.